Upon hearing the news, I immediately made an informed assumption that the negotiations had failed, and that Israel and America had finally carried out their threats to strike Iran’s nuclear facilities. Just a day earlier, Mr. Trump had declared that if talks reached a deadlock, he would be “leading the pack” in attacking Iran. I had little doubt — considering the current geopolitical climate – that an attack seemed like the most logical assumption.
Assumptions
Assumptions, however, are not a new trend that emerged on social media. It is an age-old problem that even existed as far back as the time of King Solomon, around 970–931 BC. He wrote the following:
The answer lies in a shift of perspective—by changing the lenses through which we look.
Iran stands at a spiritual crossroads, and it is only by acknowledging God’s active presence among the people of Iran that we can begin to comprehend the depth of His redemptive power.
How will our positional convictions shape our assumptions? We pray that the explosion will be another opportunity that God’s power might be seen at work in Iran.
STEP TWO – Remove your POLITICAL glasses and see God’s sovereignty
Oh, how we love to love the people we love to love. And, in return, how love to hate the people whom we love to love, love to hate. We even build theologies around it. If we love Israel, we automatically stand against the Palestinians. They have never harmed us in any way, but the nation we love to love, love to hate them, and so should we. Make sense?
This is “wicked madness produced by foolish assumptions.”
The Boanerges brothers are classic examples of how NOT to respond from a political perspective. This was the occasion where James and John, two brothers to whom Jesus gave the nickname of being THE BOANERGES BROTHERS – sons of thunder, tried to defend the honour of Jesus in Luke 9:51. The two brothers were fiercely loyal. They took offence on behalf of Jesus, but were rebuked by the one who came to establish a culture of grace, not a religion of condemnation. Their loyalty became an obstacle, and what they thought to be a virtue was actually a vice.
“But Jesus turned and rebuked them.” (Verse 55)
In 1 Timothy 2:4, Paul reminds us that God desires “ALL men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth.” This verse implies that God’s will is that ALL people should be saved. Not SOME people, SOME of the time in SOME nations only. Jesus came to earth that ALL may be saved, everywhere – in Iran and Israel, in Palestine and America, the ANC, the DA, the EFF, the Democrats and the Republicans – ALL
Our assumptions are always driven by our prejudices. We will ALWAYS believe the worst first of those we fear, suspect or dislike. We are instinct-driven beings. When we hear about a farm murder in South Africa, our first assumption is that it is due to another ANC failure in one way or another. We never assume first that it could have been a family member. When we are proven wrong, we seldom stop to reconsider our default modes.
Probably the best worst example in scripture of assumptions driven by prejudice is Nathanael, a man described by Jesus himself as an “Israelite in whom there is no deceit””.
Sounds like many modern-day Christians
Nonetheless, in all his zeal and righteousness, in all his achievements and spiritual accolades, Jesus exposed one toxic and incapacitating blind spot in his spiritual armour that he did not recognise himself: he lived in a Bethsaidian bubble of prejudice—a bubble shaped by a religious prejudice that caused spiritual pride, a self-righteous view of others and a debilitating dualism.
It is enormously humbling to know that we all carry our inner Nathanael into every conversation, every interaction, and every discussion. If you ask the question today; “can anything good come from Gaza?” or “can anything good come from Iran?” you suffer from your own Bathsaidian Syndrome. You need to take off your glasses and look through the all-inclusive lenses of a God who wants all to be saved.
How will our prejudices shape our assumptions? I have been to Iran several times. Iran is home to some of the most beautiful, friendly, kind, warm, and hospitable people on earth. YES, something great can come from Iran, from Gaza, from Lebanon and from Israel.
STEP FOUR – Remove your PERCEPTIONAL glasses and see God’s perspective
Where can we find a better example in scripture than Peter’s perception of loyalty and Jesus’s perspective of devotion?
God is God. He is unfazed and ever-forgiving. He operates under a different set of rules. He came as an expression of grace. So, be careful how you, as a recipient of grace, respond from your safe and secure bubble. You might just evoke a rebuke from God by assuming your loyal support is a sign of loving devotion. All we need to do is be conduits of grace, not cul-de-sacs of mercy.
God’s perspective involves seeing the world, oneself, and others through a lens of eternal truth, love, and purpose. It goes beyond superficial observations and quick assumptions and seeks to understand the underlying reality and God’s plan for everything and everyone.
How will our perceptions shape our assumptions? Will we allow God’s perspective to changes both our view and our attitudes .
STEP FIVE – Remove your PIOUS glasses and see God’s compassion
One encounter in Scripture that describes God’s care and compassion best is the story of Bartimaeus: the blind, unclean, begging son of a blind, unclean, begging father.
The encounter in Mark 10 is a story of someone who needed help and cried out in anguish to the followers of Christ, only to be rebuked, reprimanded, and ignored. It is a lesson on how the physically blind exposed the spiritually blind. The picture painted in Mark 10:46-52 is a sad one. And in all honesty, if we have to paint a picture of the world today, it would probably not be much different:
The one thing that the religious and the devout assumed on this solemn occasion was that Jesus would not care as much about Bartimaeus as He would about them. They despised this man who would draw His attention away from their sacred enjoyment and their religious duty. Someone like Bartimaeus – an inconvenient distraction on our journey with Christ – someone like a refugee, a starving child in Gaza, a homeless beggar rummaging through our garbage – all intruding on our pious duty of following Christ in the crowds.
How will our pious Christianity shape our assumptions? Hopefully not like the crowds, the disciples, the rebukers, or the followers of Jesus. They were so obsessed with their personal encounter with Jesus that they made no room for those whom Jesus actually came to help. Yes, read carefully, it is indeed possible to be so obsessed with God that we stop noticing the people in need. And let’s be brutally honest. If the beggar, the refugee, the homeless and the poor inconvenience us, then we are part of the crowds. If ever there was a reason for the disciples to have pity on someone, it was here. And they failed the test miserably.
In order to develop the virtue of helpfulness, we need to remove our glasses. In order to have an assumption-free view of the Middle East, Iran, Gaza, and Israel, we have to exchange our carnal perspectives for a new spirit-filled incarnational approach.
