Written by Stefan van der Berg (Ministry Leader at dia-LOGOS)
In a recent interview with Tucker Carlson, President Vladimir Putin addressed a fundamental question about the intersection of Christianity and leadership, particularly in contexts where tough decisions must be made.
When Carlson asked, "How can a leader, who has to kill, be a Christian? How do you reconcile with that?"
Putin responded, "It is very easy when it comes to protecting oneself, one's family and one's homeland. We won't attack anyone. As for religion in general you know it's not about external manifestations. It's not about going to Church every day or banging your head on the floor. It is in the heart and our cultural is so human oriented. Dostoevsky who was very well known in the West and the genius of Russian culture, spoke a lot about the Russian soul."
When Tucker Carlson posed the question of reconciling Christianity with leadership decisions involving life and death, Putin's response offered an insight into his nuanced perspective on faith and governance. Reflecting on his narrative of a secret baptism as a baby to proudly wearing a baptismal cross throughout his political career, we delve deeper into the symbolic significance attached to his religious journey.
Vladimir Putin's journey from atheism to Orthodox Christianity has been nothing short of profound.
Early Religious Influences.
His early years were marked by the atheistic environment of the Soviet Union, where religious practices were often suppressed. Despite this, his mother was a devout Christian who secretly baptized him in the Russian Orthodox Church. This clandestine baptism, conducted without the knowledge of his staunchly atheist father, introduced President Putin to the Christian faith at a young age, planting the seeds of spirituality that would grow over time.
His religious beliefs remained mostly private throughout his early years and into adulthood. It wasn’t until later in his political career that he publicly embraced and showcased his Orthodox faith, aligning it with his vision for Russia. This evolution from a quiet initiation to a public declaration of faith offers insight into both his personal development and political strategy.
In the late 1990s President Putin's mother gave him a small baptismal cross, blessed during a pilgrimage to the Holy Land, urging him to wear it for protection. This cross has since become a deeply personal and spiritual symbol for President Putin. During a vacation at a dacha in the 1990s, a fire broke out, destroying much of the property. Amidst the chaos, the cross was lost but found unharmed in the ashes. President Putin interprets this as a miraculous sign, reinforcing his belief in its protective power.
Putin 's personal faith journey became more publicly evident after he assumed the presidency in 2000. He has often publicly spoken about the influence of his mother and the importance of the Russian Orthodox Church in his life. His public displays of faith, such as attending church services and meeting with religious leaders, suggest that his early experiences with clandestine religious practices and the spiritual resilience of his family have had a lasting impact on his personal and political identity.
Influence of the Russian Orthodox Church on Putin's Beliefs
The Russian Orthodox Church plays a pivotal role not just in President Putin's private life but also in shaping his public policies. Bishop Tikhon Shevkunov, a prominent figure within the Russian Orthodox Church who is often rumoured to be President Putin's spiritual advisor, symbolizes more than just religious counsel; he represents the alignment of spiritual and political aspirations. Many Russians view this intertwining of faith and leadership with reverence, seeing it as a reclaiming of the cultural and spiritual legacy that suffered during the Soviet era.
The actions of a devout Christian statesman is not merely for show; it could also be seen to be a calculated move to resonate deeply with the Russian populace's religious sentiments. Yet, this blend of faith and power is not without controversy. Critics argue that his biblical justifications for political and military actions muddy the waters between genuine faith and political rhetoric.
The Role of Personal Faith in Putin's Domestic Policies
Domestically, President Putin uses religion to promote social cohesion and stability. The Russian Orthodox Church supports many of his policies, from anti-LGBTQ legislation to the promotion of 'traditional family values.' This symbiotic relationship helps to maintain public order and divert attention from economic and political issues.
He often frames his actions within a moral and spiritual context, portraying Russia as a defender of traditional Christian values against what he sees as the moral decay of the West. This has had a profound impact on both domestic policies, such as laws against LGBTQ+ propaganda, and foreign policies, including Russia's stance in conflicts involving Orthodox Christian communities.
'First and foremost we should be governed by common sense. But common sense should be based on moral principles first. And it is not possible today to have morality separated from religious values.' This quote underscores the intertwining of his political ideology with his personal faith and moral values.' Vladimir Putin
Global Consequences: Putin's Faith on the International Stage
However, President Putin's use of religion is not without controversy. Critics argue that his embrace of Orthodoxy is more about political expediency than genuine faith. They point to instances where religious rhetoric is used to justify authoritarian measures, such as the suppression of political dissent and the curtailment of religious freedoms for minority groups.
The intertwining of personal faith with political maneuvers offers a complex mosaic of motivation, strategy, and belief. While some view him as a genuine protector of Christianity, others see his actions as calculated moves designed to bolster Russia's geopolitical influence. The line between genuine conviction and political opportunism remains blurred.
Conclusion
President Putin's visit to Pyongyang provided a unique context to scrutinize whether Putin's faith would influence his stance on human rights issues or if geopolitical strategy would dominate his actions. As the discussions have now concluded, we are left to ponder how Putin navigated this complex intersection of faith and diplomacy within one of the world's most repressive regimes. Did his decisions reflect a genuine blend of religious values and political strategy, or did the pragmatic demands of geopolitical interests take precedence?
Only he will truly know.
