Saudi Prince Ends 50-Year Petrodollar Deal: Global Economic Implications

Written by Stefan van der Berg (Ministry Leader at dia-LOGOS)

One of the most significant economic deals of the century just came to an end. The longstanding petrodollar agreement between Saudi Arabia and the United States expired on June 9th, 2024. This system, which has been in place for 50 years, marks a huge shift in global economics.

Saudi Arabia will now sell oil in multiple currencies, including the Chinese RMB, Euros, Yen, and Yuan, instead of exclusively in US dollars.

Historical Context of the Petrodollar System

To understand the significance of this change, we need to delve into the history of the petrodollar system. After World War II, the United States emerged as the dominant global superpower, and the U.S. dollar became the world's reserve currency. This status was cemented by the Bretton Woods Agreement in 1944, which pegged the dollar to gold and established it as the standard for international trade.

However, in 1971, President Richard Nixon took the dollar off the gold standard, leading to a potential crisis of confidence in the dollar. To stabilize the currency and ensure its dominance, Nixon and his Secretary of State, Henry Kissinger, devised the petrodollar system. In a secret meeting on the USS Quincy, they struck a deal with Saudi Arabia: in exchange for military protection and weapons, Saudi Arabia agreed to price its oil exclusively in U.S. dollars. This arrangement forced other countries to hold dollars to buy oil, thereby creating a steady global demand for the currency.

The Benefits of the Petrodollar System for the U.S.

The petrodollar system conferred significant advantages to the United States. Firstly, it created a consistent global demand for U.S. dollars, which helped maintain the dollar's value and stability. This stability facilitated international trade and investment, as countries around the world held dollars in their reserves and used them for transactions.

Secondly, the system enabled the U.S. to run large trade deficits without devaluing its currency. Countries like Japan, China, and the UK parked their wealth in U.S. treasury bonds, viewing them as safe investments. This influx of foreign investment allowed the U.S. to finance its deficits and maintain lower interest rates, which spurred economic growth and liquidity in financial markets.

Economist Barry Eichengreen of the University of California, Berkeley, explains, "The petrodollar system essentially allowed the U.S. to borrow cheaply and maintain economic dominance. It was a cornerstone of post-war economic stability."

The End of the Petrodollar Agreement

On June 9th, 2024, the Prince of Saudi Arabia announced that the kingdom would not renew the petrodollar agreement. This decision is part of a broader trend where countries are seeking to diversify their foreign exchange reserves and reduce dependence on the U.S. dollar in international trade.

The Role of BRICS

Countries like China and Russia have been gradually reducing their dollar holdings and increasing their reserves of other currencies and gold. The formation of the BRICS alliance (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) is another indication of the shift away from dollar dominance. Recently, Saudi Arabia has also expressed interest in joining BRICS, which could further diminish the dollar's role in global oil transactions.

Economist and author Stephen Roach notes, "The end of the petrodollar agreement is a pivotal moment. It reflects a broader movement towards a multipolar currency world where the U.S. dollar's hegemony is challenged."

Implications for the U.S. and Global Economy

The expiration of the petrodollar agreement could have several profound implications for the U.S. and the global economy.

Decreased Demand for the Dollar

As countries move away from pricing oil exclusively in dollars, the global demand for the currency could decline. This would potentially weaken the dollar and make U.S. imports more expensive, contributing to higher inflation.

Impact on U.S. Treasury Bonds

With fewer countries needing to hold large reserves of dollars, demand for U.S. treasury bonds could fall. This would make it more expensive for the U.S. to finance its deficits and could lead to higher interest rates.

Economic Instability

The stability provided by the petrodollar system has been a cornerstone of the global financial system. Its end could lead to increased volatility and uncertainty in international markets.

Shift in Global Power

The move away from the dollar could accelerate the shift in global economic power towards emerging markets and countries within the BRICS alliance. This could lead to a more multipolar world where no single currency or country dominates international trade.

Global Perspective

For instance, China's efforts to promote the yuan as an alternative to the dollar have been intensifying. China's Belt and Road Initiative and increasing trade with countries willing to use the yuan are part of this strategy. Similarly, Russia's pivot towards using euros and yuan in its trade deals signals a strategic move to reduce dollar dependency. A report from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) highlights that while the dollar remains dominant, its share in global reserves has been gradually declining. The IMF states, "The diversification of reserves reflects the changing dynamics of global trade and economic power."

The U.S. Response and Future Prospects

In response to these changes, the U.S. has limited options. It could raise interest rates to attract foreign investment, but this would also increase borrowing costs domestically and could slow economic growth. Alternatively, the U.S. could engage in more diplomatic efforts to strengthen economic ties and create new trade agreements.

Despite these challenges, the U.S. dollar remains the dominant currency in global finance. According to the Atlantic Council, 59% of the world's foreign exchange reserves are still held in dollars, and 88% of foreign exchange transactions involve the dollar. The U.S. also benefits from having the world's largest and most advanced military, which underpins its economic and political influence.

Former Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke remarked, "The dollar's dominance is underpinned by the strength of U.S. institutions and the confidence the world has in the U.S. economy. While shifts are occurring, the dollar's role is far from over."

Conclusion

The end of the petrodollar agreement between Saudi Arabia and the United States marks a significant turning point in global economics. While the immediate effects may not be catastrophic, the long-term implications could reshape the global financial system. As countries continue to diversify their reserves and reduce dependence on the dollar, the U.S. will need to adapt to maintain its economic stability and influence. This shift underscores the importance of understanding global economic trends and preparing for a more multipolar world.

The Shifting Sands of Power: A Christian Perspective

The tremors shaking the global financial system, evidenced by the potential decline of the petrodollar system, resonate beyond the realm of economics. They echo in the halls of missiology, prompting reflection on another momentous shift: the geographical center of Christianity moving from the West to the Global South.

A Shared Narrative of Power Shifts

While the change of the US dollar's dominance signifies a shift in economic power, the growth of Christianity in the Global South reflects a parallel shift in religious influence. The West, once the undisputed centre of both financial and religious authority, is witnessing a decentralization of power on both fronts. This shared narrative of power shifts compels us to ask missiological questions:

- How does the changing economic landscape impact the spread of faith?

- Will increased prosperity in the Global South translate to more resources for churches and missionary work?

At the heart of the Church is an interdependent community with a worldwide vision. This commitment to live with an open Bible on a large open map makes an important contribution to global missions. But this also requires an open mind and an open hand, fostering exposure and partnerships. "Twinning" is not a new concept in global missions, but a neglected one. For too long, missions was a one-way street where there was a ‘sender’ and a ‘receiver’. Developing partnerships is the new norm, and "twinning" churches with churches and believers with believers will take missions beyond traditional limitations, allowing all role-players to play equally significant roles.

Financial Resources and Interdependence

It's important to acknowledge the financial realities within the global Christian community. Christians globally generate an estimated $12.3 trillion annually, with $213 billion directed towards Christian causes. While a significant portion (87%) of foreign mission funds supports existing Christian communities, a smaller but not insignificant amount (12%) goes towards evangelizing non-Christians, and a lesser amount (1%) targets unevangelized groups.

This internal distribution of resources, alongside a more geographically dispersed financial base for mission work, necessitates a shift towards more interdependent mission structures. This could involve Southern Christian communities playing a larger role in shaping mission strategies and resource allocation, fostering a more collaborative and globally-minded approach.

A Call for Organic Partnerships

The future of missions must be built on organic and relational partnerships between Christian groups and individuals. Paul's metaphor of the Body of Christ (1 Corinthians 12) gives clear encouragement to churches to acknowledge our interdependency, deny our self-sufficiency, and develop partnerships with other parts of the worldwide body of Christ. The Word is uncompromising in addressing the independence that many mission activities sadly reflect:

"As it is, there are many parts, but one body. The eye cannot say to the hand, 'I don't need you!' And the head cannot say to the feet, 'I don't need you!' On the contrary, those parts of the body that seem to be weaker are indispensable." (1 Corinthians 12:20-22)

No part of the Church can do it alone. We need each other. We are called to work in partnership with others.

Twinning: Strengthening the Global Church

Building on this call for interdependence, cross-cultural partnerships like "twinning" can help develop the vision of the Church and the world. For too long, there were those on the giving end of missions and those on the receiving end of missions. "Twinning" will strengthen both the ‘giver’ and the ‘receiver’ and will give both role-players the opportunity to change roles from time to time.

The Church, described as a ‘body’, a living organism, allows for all to discover the joys of reaching cultures previously unreachable. The achievement of this purpose through interdependent partnerships will help to transform the Church and the lives of individual Christians.

The tremors in the financial system and the movement of Christianity's centre are powerful reminders that the world is constantly changing. Missional reflection in these times requires us to discern the deeper meaning of these shifts and embrace the possibilities they present, including new models of financial and strategic collaboration within the global Body of Christ.

https://www.newarab.com/news/saudi-arabia-about-drop-petrodollar-chinese-yuan#:~:text="Saudi%20Arabia%20will%20now%20sell,countries%20in%20the%20Global%20South.

https://abwe.org/blog/world-christianity-undergoing-seismic-shift/#:~:text=The%20United%20States%20still%20sends,%2C%20South%20Korea%2C%20and%20India.

https://www.thetravelingteam.org/stats

https://www.aboutmissions.org/statistics.html

https://davidjoannes.com/shocking-stats-on-missions-giving/

https://dialogos.co.za/blog/twinning-adapting-mission-strategy-to-changing-realities/