Syrian Elections and the Challenge of Building Inclusivity
For Syria's first parliamentary elections since the fall of the Assad regime, the article highlights a significant challenge: achieving inclusivity and fair representation for minority groups, which fear being marginalized by the new, non-popular voting process.
Written by Stefan van der Berg

DAMASCUS—Syria prepares for its first parliamentary elections since the collapse of the Assad regime, with a new 210-seat legislature scheduled for September. While this marks a significant step toward political reconstruction, the process faces substantial hurdles—particularly regarding the fair representation and security of minority communities amid ongoing sectarian tensions.

The New Political Landscape and Its Risks.

Under the leadership of Ahmad al-Sharaa, the government emphasizes reconstruction and economic revival as its primary priorities. This focus has already resulted in notable diplomatic negotiations, including the lifting of US sanctions and the removal of al-Sharaa’s group, Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, from the US list of foreign terrorist organizations. Significant investments from Gulf nations—such as Saudi Arabia’s pledged $6.4 billion for real estate and infrastructure and a $14 billion deal with Qatar and the UAE—are pouring into the country to bolster these efforts.

However, many analysts caution that economic aid alone isn’t enough to bridge Syria’s long-standing divisions. The country’s scars run deep, and sustainable peace will require addressing political and societal fractures alongside economic recovery.

The Electoral Process and Its Implications

The upcoming parliamentary election has a unique format that is likely to deepen scepticism. Out of the 210 seats,140 will be allocated by local electoral committees, while the remaining 70 will be appointed directly by the President— There will be no seats filled by popular vote.

This controlled approach raises concerns about the legitimacy of the process and the potential marginalization of ordinary Syrians. Critics argue that such a system primarily serves the regime’s interests, ensuring predetermined results that lack genuine popular input.

Impact on Minority Communities

The Assad regime spent decades instilling fear into Christian and other minority communities in Syria, warning them that the regime’s fall would inevitably lead to a doomsday scenario filled with battling Muslim extremist groups, even touting the U.S.-led “war on terror” as an excuse for domestic oppression and the killing and forced disappearance of hundreds of thousands of Syrian civilians. That cynical strategy served to create division and barriers of fear between communities, reinforcing sentiments that come to the fore with any incident. 

The limited electoral participation and the non-transparent selection process are likely to heighten fears among Syria’s diverse minority groups. Communities such as Alawites, Druze, Christians, and Kurds worry that the system favours the Sunni majority at their expense. While the government has attempted to include minority representatives in its official discourse, many see such efforts as largely symbolic—token gestures that do little to influence actual power-sharing.

Recent violence has exposed the fragile state of sectarian relations. In early August, clashes erupted between Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) and government troops in the northeast. Meanwhile, in Suwayda—a region home to Druze—the aftermath of intense fighting has left over 1,400 dead and displaced nearly 175,000 people. Coastal areas of Latakia and Tartus have also seen violence, with reports indicating that between 1,400 and 1,700 deaths and thousands more displaced.

The ongoing bloodshed underlines the persistent wounds and unresolved grievances among minority communities. Alawites fleeing their coastal homes amid revenge attacks, and massacres targeting Druze populations, highlight the deep scars of conflict that remain unhealed since the regime’s fall.

The Road to Reconciliation

The true challenge for al-Sharaa’s government—and Syria as a whole—is fostering genuine trust and initiating a nationwide reconciliation process. Without bridging divides and addressing past grievances transparently, the elections risk exacerbating sectarian tensions and violence.

A potential approach to foster national healing could involve establishing a truth and reconciliation process like our South African model. Instead of focusing solely on retribution, such a mechanism would aim to unearth the full truth behind the country’s past atrocities—mass killings, torture, corruption, and other crimes.

By prioritizing transparency and understanding, this process could help Syria transition from a justice system centered on punishment to one rooted in reconciliation. It would be a vital step toward rebuilding public trust and creating a new social pact based on shared aspirations.

Syria’s path forward has always been fraught with difficulty. At present, the country faces a dire risk: economic recovery, coupled with ethnic and sectarian tensions and a politicized, militarized landscape, could push Syria toward state failure. Without genuine reconciliation and inclusive governance, the risk of deepening fragmentation remains a constant threat.

The Church as a Testament to Syria’s Rich Christian Heritage

Syria’s Christian community is among the oldest in the world, with roots that date back to the very dawn of Christianity. Historically, it is in Syria that the followers of Jesus were first called “Christians”—a recognition that underscores the nation’s pivotal role in early Christian history. The Christian church in Damascus, for instance, was established within just two years of Christ’s ascension. It was a city that even Saul of Tarsus—later known as Paul—visited to persecute its followers, illustrating the deep historical ties between Syria and the Christian faith.

A Decade of Suffering and Exodus

Since the outbreak of civil war in 2011, Syria’s Christian population has experienced a dramatic decline—from approximately 1.8 million to around 579,000 today—losing nearly two-thirds of its members. Factors behind this exodus include the surge of extremist groups like ISIS and Al-Nusra, persistent persecution, economic collapse, and conscription pressures that forced many young men to flee.

The people of Syria are asking questions not about the very existence of God, but they are wondering why God is silent, not moving or performing miracles to save people.

Church leaders have worked tirelessly under these circumstances, often becoming the last source of hope and support for their communities. With most Syrians living below the poverty line—an estimated 90%—churches have extended aid through food, shelter, medical care, and spiritual encouragement. Despite these efforts, the community remains under immense strain, facing ongoing hardship and so Syria’s ancient Christian heritage continues to stand as a testament to faith and resilience amidst turbulent times.